As stated on the front page of the newspaper are up intense jesse eisenberg debate between violinist Helgason, merchant of Akureyri, and Director of KEA, Halldor Johannsson. jesse eisenberg Hjörleifur is a former editor of the day of the week. He sold KEA Day of Week for almost a decade. Halldór sake of Hjörleifur rangærslur after Hjörleifur wrote Articles submitted in Akureyri Vikublað two weeks ago. Because the issues raised in criticism of violinist KEA sent Akureyri Vikublað Secretary KEA query Halldór Jóhannsson has responded on behalf of the company.
"Buying KEA on almost one-third of Ásbyrgi flora in early 2013 were based on the same assumptions and other investments KEA. KEA came together with other shareholders to the company. Decision to invest in this company included based on the fact that the company was growing dramatically through the acquisition of companies with similar operations but with buybacks of Maxim in the capital were all manufacturing activities and jobs moved to Akureyri and turnover close þrefölduð. The company considers nearly 400 million and employs 11 people. Recently had shareholdings in Ásbyrgi Flora offers a share they agreed the KEA entered the bid on the basis of pre-emptive rights. Focus offerors and KEA on the future operations of the company were different and ate his pre-emptive KEA KEA but wants to try the expansion and reconstruction of Akureyri jesse eisenberg and aims to maintain jesse eisenberg growth. KEA has re-sold a 20% share of assets in Ásbyrgi flowering. As with all investments that will bring it one time seen whether this proves successful or not. "
Should you have call Hjörleifur jesse eisenberg ill after his article appeared and have viðrað including whether KEA would dómstólaleiðina the writing of others? What issues are there if correct, that you think fall under defamation in an article violinist?
"Yes, it is true that I had a relationship jesse eisenberg with that person but I was not evil. This article referred to me as an individual as well as the chairman of the company's allegations of abuse in our KEA to favor either ourselves or alleged friends at the expense of KEA. It is evil to it to create the public are served unfounded accusations of individuals based on kjaftasögum or distortion. This relates to me personally, no less than KEA and for that reason I had a conversation with the author as I corrected the misstatements and asked what it would be with this offense at me as a person and whether he realized that there might possibly be Hurting publish comments. Do I as an individual, or chairman KEA will chase straps with those articles of the author. He has and will continue to discuss the KEA and those who work there and it is of course free. Misstatements judge, however, themselves, "replies manager KEA. -BÞ
Most Read today's psychologists and KA home to commemorate the struggle of man in Christian devotion Orri Jóhannsson focus operations have been heavy but brighter times ahead power not only for the victims of sexual violence
Top
No comments:
Post a Comment